RESUMO
La promoción de la salud puede ayudar a reducir las desigualdades y velar por la igualdad de oportunidades, proporcionando los medios que permitan a toda la población desarrollar su máximo potencial de salud. Las mujeres que viven en zonas con necesidades de transformación social (ZNTS) son un grupo especialmente vulnerable por la situación de exclusión social y privación material en que viven; los programas de promoción de la salud en este colectivo pueden contribuir a la mejora de su salud. En este trabajo se describe el programa de promoción de la salud Grupos Socioeducativos de Atención Primaria dirigidos a Mujeres (GRUSE-M), y se evalúa su implantación en diversas ZNTS de la ciudad de Sevilla, así como los beneficios y las dificultades de su desarrollo, a través de un análisis documental y de entrevistas a profesionales que lo están implementando
Health promotion can contribute towards reducing inequality and ensuring equal opportunities, providing the means to enable the entire population to develop its maximum health possibilities. Women living in areas with social transformation needs (ASTN) are an especially vulnerable group due to the situation of material deprivation and social exclusion in which they live. Health promotion programmes for this group can bring about an improvement in their health. This paper describes the health promotion programme Socio-educational Groups of Primary Care for Women (SEGPC-W), and evaluates its implementation in ASTN in the city of Seville (Spain), as well as the benefits and difficulties of its development through a documentary analysis and interviews with participating professionals
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Promoção da Saúde/métodos , Saúde da Mulher/tendências , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Acesso aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Serviços de Saúde da Mulher/organização & administração , Marginalização Social , Entrevistas como AssuntoRESUMO
Health promotion can contribute towards reducing inequality and ensuring equal opportunities, providing the means to enable the entire population to develop its maximum health possibilities. Women living in areas with social transformation needs (ASTN) are an especially vulnerable group due to the situation of material deprivation and social exclusion in which they live. Health promotion programmes for this group can bring about an improvement in their health. This paper describes the health promotion programme Socio-educational Groups of Primary Care for Women (SEGPC-W), and evaluates its implementation in ASTN in the city of Seville (Spain), as well as the benefits and difficulties of its development through a documentary analysis and interviews with participating professionals.
Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde/organização & administração , Áreas de Pobreza , Saúde da Mulher , Feminino , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Desenvolvimento de Programas , Pesquisa Qualitativa , Alienação Social , Espanha , População UrbanaRESUMO
The objective of the study is to evaluate and compare the degree of serological protection conferred by the three components of two MMR vaccines: "Vac triple MSD" (Aventis Pasteur MSD) and "Triviraten" (Berna), and to study the effects of a second dose of "Priorix" (Glaxo SmithKline), in an unprotected population. In March 2001, this study was conducted in a sample of 86 children aged 3 and 4 years, in two Basic Health Zones of Cádiz (Spain). Mumps, measles and rubella antibody titers were evaluated by IgG enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). All the children showing lack of response were revaccinated with the vaccine "Priorix" of GSK; in 12 of these children (all vaccinated previously with "Triviraten"), studies confirmed the existence of seroconversion utilizing the same methodology. The most outstanding finding has been the low percentage of children vaccinated with "Triviraten" possessing protective titers (>1:500) against mumps (14.3%) compared with those vaccinated with "Vac triple MSD" (81.1%, P<0.000001); geometric mean values (GMT) of 164 and 1631, respectively, were obtained. Significant differences, and in the same direction, were also found in respect of measles (83.7 and 100%, and GMT of 889 and 5076), although not so striking. However, all the children studied did have protective titres (>16UI/ml) of antibodies against rubella. Of the 12 children studied who had not responded with protective titers of anti-mumps antibodies, eight children (66.7%) showed seroconversion with "Priorix", and only one child (25%) presented seroconversion in the response to measles. We have thus proved that the "Rubini" strain provides insufficient protection against mumps in our child population. We have also found that the "Edmonston-Zagreb" strain confers less protection against measles than the "Enders" strain, although the "Schwarz" strain, after revaccination of the children who had failed with the "Edmonston-Zagreb" strain, did not achieve a satisfactory seroconversion, either.
